Skip to main content

Challenges faced by Chinese community nurses when providing home-based hospice and palliative care: a descriptive qualitative study

A Correction to this article was published on 06 June 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Hospital facilities in China are experiencing increased strain on existing systems and medical resources, necessitating the use of home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC). HBHPC primarily relies on community nurses and related medical personnel. Understanding the challenges that community nurses face when providing this form of care is urgently needed to optimize the design and delivery of HBHPC. Our study aimed to gain insight into community nurses’ challenges when providing HBHPC for patients.

Methods

We performed a descriptive qualitative study using a phenomenology approach. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 13 nurses from two community health service centers in Jinan, Shandong Province, China. A thematic analysis was applied to identify themes from the transcribed data.

Results

Three major themes emerged: 1) Community nurses’ inadequate self-preparation for providing HBHPC; 2) Patients and their families’ non-collaboration in HBHPC; 3) Community health service career disadvantages. Many negative experiences can be attributed to institutional barriers.

Conclusion

Community nurses faced multifaceted challenges in home care settings. This study could provide a framework for guiding the improvement of interventional variables in the provision of HBHPC. Future research should involve developing effective methods of improving community nurses’ job motivation and community health service institutions’ incentive systems, as well as increasing advocacy around HBHPC.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Palliative care has been associated with relieving suffering and optimizing the quality of life among patients with poor disease prognoses and their families [1]. Existing studies suggest that most people prefer to receive care and to die at home, and a majority of patients do not change their opinion as their disease progresses [2]. The focus of hospice and palliative care should not only be on controlling physical symptoms but also on meeting the patient’s preference for their place of death [3, 4]. The Cochrane systematic review showed that home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) increased the odds of dying at home [5]. Previous evidence has shown that patients who received HBHPC had lower symptom burdens, lower health care costs, and higher care satisfaction [6, 7]. Care at home fulfilled patients’ wishes to avoid excessive medical treatment and to achieve a dignified death [8, 9].

There are two main systems of providing HBHPC in China. One functions through hospitals, and the other relies on community health centers (CHCs) [10]. The former requires more hospital resources and time, and incurs higher patient costs that are not covered by health insurance [10]. Home-based hospice and palliative care offered by CHCs are a potential solution for easing current pressures on hospitals. HBHPC teams are composed of community nurses, general practitioners, and rehabilitation physicians who provide high-quality care for patients in residential communities with populations of around 30,000 people [11, 12]. A few healthcare professionals from each CHC are often selected to attend short training on hospice and palliative care [13].

In the past few years, some CHCs have begun to launch HBHPC services, which are often organized by nurses, general practitioners, rehabilitation therapists, and pharmacists. The municipal government has assisted communities in certifying eligibility for HBHPC recipients. Despite this progress, HBHPC programs have been difficult to implement due to insufficient legislation and policy, as well as a lack of financial, educational, and training resources [14]. Furthermore, most patients and their families have a low degree of knowledge and acceptance of hospice and palliative care, mostly due to the influence of traditional Chinese culture—discussing death remains taboo [15,16,17].

Home-based hospice and palliative care programs put higher demand on community nurses’ skills, because HBHPC moves specialized caring out of CHCs into the home environment [18]. The role of HBHPC community nurse is a relatively new phenomenon. The profession is not well-known, and neither are the challenges faced by these nurses. This lack of knowledge hinders efforts to evaluate how HBHPC can reach its full potential and support the national government’s public health goals. Understanding specific challenges experienced by community nurses when delivering patient and family-centered hospice and palliative care in home-based conditions may allow us to improve HBHPC quality and guide future healthcare delivery. Therefore, we aimed to explore the challenges faced by community nurses when providing HBHPC.

Methods

Aim

This study explored the challenges faced by community nurses who provide HBHPC.

Study design

We used a descriptive phenomenology approach to explore the obstacles experienced by community nurses who provided HBHPC [19]. We conducted semi-structured, in-depth, face-to-face interviews to collect data between October 2018 and February 2019.

Setting/participants

The study was conducted through two CHCs in Jinan, China. Shandong Province is the second-most populous province in China and its population faces a high disease burden [20]. The city of Jinan in Shandong Province is also home to a large elderly population with prominent features of aging and disability. Home-based patients present a substantial demand for hospice and palliative care [20].

We used purposive sampling for nurse selection. The eligibility criteria for study participation included: 1) registered nurses who have worked in the CHC for at least 1 year; 2) provided home-based care within 6 months of the study for patients who had a diagnosis of cancer, heart failure, or other life-limiting, progressive, or disabling diseases; 3) ability to speak Mandarin. Exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) nursing interns; 2) declined to participate in the interview. Each nurse was interviewed in a private room during their work time. No new themes emerged from participants’ experiences when the number of community nurses reached 14.

Ethical approval

The Ethics Review Board of Shandong University’s School of Nursing and Rehabilitation approved this study (No. 2016-e-23). Participants gave fully informed consent by signing a consent form, and all documents were kept private and confidential. All audio-recorded interviews were reviewed by the transcriber and the principal investigator only, and each participant was identified by a specific code number rather than by name.

Data collection

Two interviewers with qualitative research and interview skills conducted the entire interview process. Before data collection, the researcher visited the targeted CHCs. She gained the support of the CHCs’ leadership, established a trusting relationship with nurses, and learned about HBHPC.

The primary researcher then explained the purpose, methods, and significance of the study to potential participants; collected general demographic data; assured the interviewees of the anonymity and confidentiality of their information; and promised that the collected data would not affect participants’ work performance evaluations. After obtaining participants’ informed consent, interviews were conducted and recorded. Data collection involved semi-structured, personalized, face-to-face interviews with nurses performed in Mandarin Chinese by the primary researcher, who had background experience in nursing, allowing for better understanding of the participants’ perspectives. The other researcher took notes during the interview, which were used to provide contextual information concerning the interview for future reference.

The interview outline was developed through literature review and consulting professionals, and our research group discussed the question outline in advance. The interview started with two open-ended questions, and then follow-up questions were asked to clarify participants’ viewpoints.

The interview’s two main questions were as follows:

  1. 1)

    What are your experiences of providing home-based hospice and palliative care?

  2. 2)

    Based on your experiences, what are the challenges, difficulties, confusions, and conflicts you have faced when providing home-based hospice and palliative care?

Data analysis

The researcher used a thematic analysis approach to analyze the interview data [21]. Within 24 h after the end of each interview, the researcher listened to the recording, referred to the on-site notes, and transcribed the recording verbatim. The “conformity method” was adopted for data analysis [21]. The researcher carefully read the data; deliberated on the recording and text content; coded, classified, reasoned, and analyzed the recurring content; and finally extracted the theme. She consulted another researcher about uncertainties regarding themes, and disagreements were discussed until consensus was reached among the research team. Finally, initial themes were communicated with participants in one-on-one face-to-face meetings [21]. Our reporting adhered to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines [22].

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

A total of 13 nurses from the two CHCs participated in our research. The nurses’ mean age was 37.2 years old, and their ages ranged from 25 to 53 years old. Their experience in providing medical care before these interviews ranged from 3 to 29 years, and their HBHPC experiences ranged from 3 to 12 months. Three community nurses had been offered bianzhi (lifelong tenure) and 10 were not tenured [23]. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the participants.

Table 1 Participant characteristics (N = 13)

Analysis results

Analysis of the data using a phenomenological research method and thematic analysis method revealed the following three themes: 1) Community nurses’ inadequate self-preparation for providing HBHPC; 2) Patients and their families’ non-collaboration in HBHPC; 3) Community health service career disadvantages (Table 2).

Table 2 Summary of all primary and sub-themes extracted from the interviews

Community nurses’ inadequate self-preparation for providing HBHPC

Community nurses’ low job motivation

While nurses considered HBHPC critical for patients with incurable diseases, it was recognized as a new form of nursing and a practice that nurses did not feel they were adequately prepared for. Most of them said that they only passively accepted the work tasks assigned by superiors.

“I just passively complete my work [home-based hospice and palliative care]. It is just a job for me. I am only here to make money.” (N3)

Some nurses described that, compared with nurses in hospitals, home care nurses had lower social status. They were rejected by patients and their family members due to a societal emphasis on medical treatment over nursing care, which made them less motivated to work.

“When I went to visit patients in a white coat, they would think that I was a doctor and they would welcome me, but when I went in a nurse uniform, I felt discriminated against.” (N6)

Community nurses’ inadequate professional ability to provide HBHPC

Community health centers offered courses in nursing theory regularly, but the nurses considered these courses superficial. Many nurses identified particular challenges in providing HBHPC, such as being unable to deliver highly individualized patient and family-centered care. It was difficult for nurses to identify their patients’ psychological challenges at different phases of their illness (e.g., soon after being diagnosed with an incurable disease, when living with the terminal illness, and at or near the terminal stage). Thus, it was difficult for them to take the initiative to prevent and relieve patients’ anxiety, depression, and distress. Community nurses were supposed to address families’ cultural preferences and requirements in their practice, but there were few opportunities for assessing and understanding family relationships. Nurses could only build on their prior personal experiences working in CHCs, as they lacked advanced training.

“It is hard for me to provide family-centered care for home-bound patients with more complex needs. For example, some family caregivers are rude to patients and do not practice good domestic hygiene… We did not know much about the patient’s religious beliefs and cultural preferences.” (N3)

“It is undeniable that I lack the experience and knowledge of psychological care. In addition, I worry that patients and caregivers may think I am weird if I talk about spiritual care (since nurses don’t do that in China).” (N12)

Patients and their families’ non-collaboration in HBHPC

Patients and their families’ behavior of poor adherence to HBHPC

The participants stated that patients’ actual health behaviors might not conform to their medical team’s recommendations. Sometimes, patients and their families even refused to accept treatment because they didn’t understand what was wrong with them or how the medical staff could help them.

“After a professional assessment of the patient, we wanted to give him some traditional Chinese medicine treatment for his persistent lower extremity edema and constipation, but he did not think he needed it.” (N8)

“It was time to replace the nasogastric tube, but family members were unwilling to let us perform this operation. They asked me to come again next Wednesday.” (N5)

Participants found that some patients’ families were not heavily involved in basic illness management and could not provide adequate affection or support. Relatives might be unable or unwilling to care for their home-bound elderly family members for a long time, and family members may rationalize their behavior by blaming others. However, nurses felt like these issues were private affairs of the patient’s family, and it was inconvenient to mediate between patients and families regarding these conflicts. This tension affected nurses’ willingness to continue visiting these patients.

“It is difficult for clinicians to intervene in family conflicts. Adult children normally take turns to care for the homebound parent, but some may be reluctant to do that. They are also not willing to pay the medical and living expenses of their elderly parent for an extended time. They use the excuse that they have a demanding, stressful job, so they do not want to take their turn to care for their parents.” (N1)

“This home-bound patient has always been taken care of by his youngest son. I asked the patient’s other son to buy some cotton swabs to help the patient moisturize his lips and mouth, but he was playing game on a smartphone and said he didn't have time.” (N2)

Patient and their families’ unaccepting attitudes toward HBHPC

Community nurses believed that the nurse-family relationship mainly depended on the patient and their family’s attitude towards palliative care. Although the nurse’s place in the home setting has the potential to become well-established through multiple visits, nurses were often rejected by patients and their families, especially in their first visits to patients’ homes. Nurses felt like they were disturbing the patients and their families.

“When I knocked, they refused to open the door because they thought I was an unsolicited salesperson, I do not understand them, and they do not understand me… they did not trust us.” (N5)

“Before, I introduced myself at the door. The nurse-patient relationship was full of uncertainty at the initial visit; I didn’t know if patients and their families would let me in, or believe me, I just don’t know.” (N9)

Community health service career disadvantages

Lack of career development opportunities

Participants desired the same career development and training opportunities offered to public hospital nurses. Compared with public hospital nurses, who are usually required to have a bachelor’s or master’s degree, community nurses only need to have a junior college degree. Community nurses are rarely given time to obtain an advanced degree or achieve higher academic qualifications. Community nurses were very rarely offered bianzhi. Some nurses stated that there are only 1 or 2 new bianzhi per year within one CHC. Senior nurses who have been employed the longest, typically older nurses, are generally given priority, so there are limitations in career development and promotion for young community nurses.

“[Compared to hospital nurses,] we [community nurses] have fewer opportunities to receive continuing education and obtain a higher professional nursing title. I just want to finish my job.” (N10)

“They [community nurses] thought of themselves as workers who were not offered bianzhi (lifelong tenure), so they lacked a sense of belonging. It was easy for them to deliver task-centered rather than patient-centered care in the process of providing home-based care. It affected the quality of home-based hospice and palliative care.” (N11)

Inadequate benefits

Many nurses had stated that they were not satisfied with their current salaries and the additional subsidies they received for providing HBHPC. More importantly, CHCs had not provided them with the necessary transportation and communication equipment needed to deliver home care. All nurses had to buy these materials at their own expense. Fringe benefits, such as transport and communication allowances, were the most frequently mentioned factor negatively affecting nurses’ motivation and intention to provide HBHPC.

“HBHPC is not a task to be taken lightly and will take a tremendous amount of time and effort to achieve, but I received minimal fringe benefits from the community health service center. We don’t charge the family for psychological care. It’s hard not to lose my motivation.” (N4)

“We have to use our own electric bikes, mobile phones, and data plans. These were all paid for by ourselves… If I use my personal phone number to contact them, I worry the patient and family would call me too often.” (N7)

Discussion

This research used a descriptive qualitative approach to explore the challenges faced by community nurses when providing HBHPC in the prefecture-level city of Jinan in China’s Shandong Province. This study found that major challenges included nurses’ inadequate self-preparation to provide HBHPC, patients and their families’ non-cooperation in HBHPC, and community health service career drawbacks. Some of the negative experiences may be related to institutional barriers. Moreover, according to participants’ responses, we noticed that external problems that arose from the patients and institutions involved in HBHPC exacerbated the internal challenges, such as low motivation, faced by the nurses themselves.

The first central theme was related to nurses’ personal issues, and was subdivided into low job motivation and professional inability to provide HBHPC. The results were similar to those of published studies [24,25,26]—a lack of HBHPC knowledge and skills among health specialists was a common challenge when delivering primary care. HBHPC is a new form of nursing practice that nurses felt they were not sufficiently prepared for. According to organization theory [27, 28], new approaches to HBHPC likely entailed organizational changes. These variations subsequently created feelings of insecurity and confusion among the nurses involved related to care coordination, multidisciplinary collaboration, and expectations about their own and other specialists’ roles [27, 28]. Previous studies have shown that educating nurses about the benefits of HBHPC could increase their understanding and motivation to serve [29]. Knowledge of and belief in the benefits of HBHPC are major predictors and explanatory variables that affect nurses’ willingness to provide HBHPC [29]. Improved HBHPC teaching materials, provision of ongoing in-service training opportunities, and regular supervision could improve community nurses’ confidence when providing HBHPC [29,30,31].

Community nurses faced difficulties related to some instances of non-cooperation from patients and their families. Home care nurses are entering a family-centered care system. In HBHPC, nurses do not solely tend to patients—families are often significant participants in patients’ care, and family involvement should be encouraged [18]. One critical strategy for providing patient and family-centered care is sharing decision-making [32, 33]. The patient or their families and nurses should share essential information, discuss risks versus benefits of various nursing options, and express their preferences [32, 33]. Effective patient-nurse communication that permits collaborative patient and family-centered care improves adherence to medical advice, leading to better palliative care outcomes [32, 33].

Patients and their families’ potential biases exacerbated nurses’ lack of motivation and confidence when providing HBHPC. Public biases tend to favor physicians over nurses, as many believe that nursing simply entails executing doctors’ orders, and lacks credibility [34, 35]. Besides enhancing nurses’ abilities of HBHPC [36, 37], HBHPC requires that providers have service-oriented motivations [38], which include altruism, humanitarian respect, seeking new experiences, wanting to help others, and personal growth [39]. Altruism and humanitarianism often are influential factors that drive one to volunteer to make a difference in others’ lives [40]. However, regardless of whether nurses embodied these characteristics, many felt unmotivated to provide HBHPC, as the increased stress and effort required to deliver psychological care and family-centered care to patients were not reflected in their salaries.

Palliative care is typically a heavily multidisciplinary practice; however, home-based services only involved nurses, general practitioners, rehabilitation specialists, and pharmacists. Effective HBHPC requires the support of additional professionals, such as hospice and palliative care volunteers and social workers, who can assist with chores and tasks in the home setting [41]. Hospice palliative care volunteers can collaborate with nurses [41,42,43]. They positively influence quality of care for patients and their families by reducing stress, and by offering practical assistance, emotional support, and companionship [41,42,43]. Integrating these volunteers into the home setting would increase the number of individuals providing perspectives on care interventions, leading to more holistic, effective care [41,42,43], especially when it is inconvenient for nurses to participate in the patient’s family affairs.

Many community nurses mentioned that providing HBHPC increased their workload compared to their previous jobs with CHCs. They highly valued jobs with bianzhi, as bianzhi for them meant being considered an employee of the state administration, which is viewed as a more stable career. Participants were dissatisfied with their current career development opportunities and benefits; this feeling eventually decreased their motivation and willingness to provide HBHPC. The pay-return imbalance model suggests that providing more energy and effort than received in return produces a sense of psychological imbalance, which leads to negative emotions and sustained stress responses [44]. Increased effort-reward imbalance is an incremental predictor of burnout [45]. The public government should increase the financial support provided to CHCs and improve performance assessment indicators. Additionally, nurses’ job performance relied on incentive mechanisms to a certain extent. Incentive management is an essential part of the field, and incentives create benefits including retention of employees and higher motivation levels from nurses. Effective incentives can ensure the continued vitality of organizational development and promote organizational goals. Community nurses should receive external rewards (wage income, fringe benefits, etc.) and internal rewards (encouragements, praise, training, evaluation, etc.) commensurate with their work responsibilities.

The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that community nurses and other CHWs can be guided to provide palliative care education to homebound patients and their families [46]. Hospice and palliative care courses should be part of continuing education available to community health workers (CHWs,) and the availability and accessibility of HBHPC education and training must be improved [46]. Chinese health authorities can focus on developing a public health care system involving nurse-led palliative home care teams with supervision by hospice-based palliative care units thereby improving the efficiency and effectiveness of education on palliative care. The Chinese government can design a policy system that considers HBHPC part of community-oriented primary health care, based on the Essential Package of palliative care for Primary Health Care (EP PHC,) to eliminate institutional barriers to the development and availability of HBHPC [47].

Strengths and limitations

In our study, purposeful sampling was used to ensure inclusion of community nurses of differing ages, lengths of nursing service, and varying levels of education. Although all participants were female, this does somewhat reflect the typical gender composition of nurses with HBHPC experiences. Our study produced a wealth of data that deepened our understanding of the HBHPC experience and challenges nurses faced when providing this form of care. Another limitation is that all participants were recruited from two CHCs in Jinan. Thus, participants’ challenges when providing HBHPC might not represent community nurses’ experiences in other cities. Exploration of the experiences and challenges of community nurses in different, more diverse settings is needed.

Conclusion

Our study generated three core themes related to community nurses’ challenges when providing HBHPC. Our research suggested that better self-preparation and increased organizational support are needed for nurses providing this form of specialized care. This study could provide a framework reference to guide the improvement of interventional variables in HBHPC. Future research should focus on improving nurses’ motivation to enhance their enthusiasm for their work, and on increasing advocacy around HBHPC.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

Abbreviations

HBHPC:

Home-Based Hospice and Palliative Care

CHCs:

Community Health Centers

References

  1. Sleeman KE, de Brito M, Etkind S, et al. The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering: projections to 2060 by world regions, age groups, and health conditions. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(7):e883–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gomes B, Calanzani N, Gysels M, et al. Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care. 2013;12:7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kalseth J, Theisen OM. Trends in place of death: the role of demographic and epidemiological shifts in end-of-life care policy. Palliat Med. 2017;31(10):964–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoare S, Morris ZS, Kelly MP, et al. Do patients want to die at home? A systematic review of the UK literature, focused on missing preferences for place of death. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142723.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gomes B, Calanzani N, Curiale V, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6(6):1–223.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gomes B, Calanzani N, Higginson IJ. Benefits and costs of home palliative care compared with usual care for patients with advanced illness and their family caregivers. JAMA. 2014;311(10):1060–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gozalo PL, Miller SC. Hospice enrollment and evaluation of its causal effect on hospitalization of dying nursing home patients. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(2):587–610.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergqvist J, Ljunggren G. The impact of integrated home palliative care services on resource use and place of death. J Palliat Med. 2020;23(1):67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chung H, Harding R, Guo P. Palliative Care in the Greater China Region: a systematic review of needs, models, and outcomes. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2021;61(3):585–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou Y, Wang S, Zhi X. Status quo of home palliative care of patients with cancer pain. Chinese Nurs Rev. 2017;31(06):641–3 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mazanec P, Ferrell B, Virani R, et al. Preparing new graduate RNs to provide primary palliative care. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2020;51(6):280–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu RY, Wang QM. Tianqiao Deepening Grid Management to Improve Sense of Wellbeing. Openings. 2020;10:52–5 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lu Y, Gu Y, Yu W. Hospice and palliative Care in China: development and challenges. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2018;5(1):26–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu K, Feng D. Barriers in palliative care in China. Lancet. 2016;387(10025):1272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu HT, Jiang WT. Research on the cognition of patients’ family members behind the present situation of palliative treatment. 2019 4th International Conference on Education Science and Development. Science. 2019;2(27):1-4.

  16. Yan Y, Zhang H, Gao W, et al. Current awareness of palliative care in China. Lancet glob. Health. 2020;8(3):e333–e335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ning XH. Hospice and palliative Care in Mainland China: history, current status and challenges. Chin Med Sci J. 2018;33(4):199–203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Del Gaudio F, Zaider TI, Brier M, et al. Challenges in providing family-centered support to families in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2012;26(8):1025–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Teherani A, Martimianakis T, Stenfors-Hayes T, et al. Choosing a qualitative research approach. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(4):669–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fu Z, Lu Z, Li Y, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in Shandong province, 2012. Chin J Cancer Res. 2016;28(3):263–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brødsgaard KE. Institutional reform and the Bianzhi system in China. China Q. 2002;170:361–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Miyashita M, Sanjo M, Morita T, et al. Barriers to providing palliative care and priorities for future actions to advance palliative care in Japan: a nationwide expert opinion survey. J Palliat Med. 2007;10(2):390–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sato K, Inoue Y, Umeda M, et al. A Japanese region-wide survey of the knowledge, difficulties and self-reported palliative care practices among nurses. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44(8):718–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahmed N, Bestall JC, Ahmedzai SH, et al. Systematic review of the problems and issues of accessing specialist palliative care by patients, carers and health and social care professionals. Palliat Med. 2004;18(6):525–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Raunkiaer M, Buch MS, Holm-Petersen C, et al. Professionals' experiences with palliative care and collaboration in relation to a randomised clinical trial: a qualitative interview study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2020;34(2):305–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leeman J, Baquero B, Bender M, et al. Advancing the use of organization theory in implementation science. Prev Med. 2019;129s:105832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hu WY, Chiu TY, Dai YT, et al. Nurses' willingness and the predictors of willingness to provide palliative care in rural communities of Taiwan. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2003;26(2):760–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vierhout M, Varenbut J, Amos E, et al. Loss of relationship: a qualitative study of families and healthcare providers after patient death and home-based palliative care ends. Ann Palliat Med. 2019;8(2):130–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sheetz MJ, Bowman MA. Pediatric palliative care: an assessment of physicians' confidence in skills, desire for training, and willingness to refer for end-of-life care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008;25(2):100–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009;47(8):826–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bukstein DA. Patient adherence and effective communication. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016;117(6):613–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dor A, Mashiach EM, Halperin O. Hospital nurses in comparison to community nurses: motivation, empathy, and the mediating role of burnout. Can J Nurs Res. 2019;51(2):72–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Russell K. Perceptions of burnout, its prevention, and its effect on patient care as described by oncology nurses in the hospital setting. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016;43(1):103–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Achora S, Labrague LJ. An integrative review on knowledge and attitudes of nurses toward palliative care: implications for practice. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2019;21(1):29–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sekse RJT, Hunskår I, Ellingsen S. The nurse's role in palliative care: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(1–2):e21–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Stelzer EM, Lang FR. Motivations of German hospice volunteers: how do they compare to nonhospice volunteers and US hospice volunteers? Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016;33(2):154–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Clary EG, Snyder M, Ridge RD, et al. Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(6):1516–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Garbay M, Gay MC, Claxton-Oldfield S. Motivations, death anxiety, and empathy in hospice volunteers in France. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2015;32(5):521–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Claxton-Oldfield S. Hospice palliative care volunteers: the benefits for patients, family caregivers, and the volunteers. Palliat Support Care. 2015;13(3):809–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vanderstichelen S, Cohen J, Van Wesemael Y, et al. Perspectives on volunteer-professional collaboration in palliative care: a qualitative study among volunteers, patients, family Carers, and health care professionals. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2019;58(2):198–207 e197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Vanderstichelen S, Cohen J, Van Wesemael Y, et al. The liminal space palliative care volunteers occupy and their roles within it: a qualitative study. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020;10(3):e28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996;1(1):27–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hasselhorn HM, Tackenberg P, Peter R. Effort-reward imbalance among nurses in stable countries and in countries in transition. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2004;10(4):401–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. World Health Organization. Integrating palliative care and symptom relief into primary health care: a WHO guide for planners, implementers and managers. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/274559/9789241514477-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 10th Dec 2021.

  47. World Health Organization. Why palliative care is an essential function of primary health care. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/328101.Accessed 10th Dec 2021.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JZ collected and analyzed the data. JZ, YC interpreted and discussed the data. JC, MS, and NY were involved in preparing the final version of the findings. All authors were involved in the preparation of the manuscript and JZ was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingjuan Cao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of School of Nursing and Rehabilitation of Shandong University supported this research (No. 2016-e-23). All the participants of this research provided their written informed consent prior to data collection and patient anonymity is preserved.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All the authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: “University of Virginia, School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA." should be "Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.” for the fourth author affiliation.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Cao, Y., Su, M. et al. Challenges faced by Chinese community nurses when providing home-based hospice and palliative care: a descriptive qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care 21, 14 (2022). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12904-022-00905-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12904-022-00905-8

Keywords