Skip to main content

Parental perspectives on the grief and support needs of children and young people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic: qualitative findings from a national survey

Abstract

Background

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many children and young people have experienced the death of close family members, whilst also facing unprecedented disruption to their lives. This study aimed to investigate the experiences and support needs of bereaved children and young people from the perspective of their parents and guardians.

Methods

We analysed cross-sectional qualitative free-text data from a survey of adults bereaved in the UK during the pandemic. Participants were recruited via media, social media, national associations and community/charitable organisations. Thematic analysis was conducted on free text data collected from parent/guardian participants in response to a survey question on the bereavement experiences and support needs of their children.

Results

Free-text data from 104 parent/guardian participants was included. Three main themes were identified: the pandemic-related challenges and struggles experienced by children and young people; family support and coping; and support from schools and services. Pandemic-challenges include the impacts of being separated from the relative prior to their death, isolation from peers and other family members, and disruption to daily routines and wider support networks. Examples were given of effective family coping and communication, but also of difficulties relating to parental grief and children’s existing mental health problems. Schools and bereavement organisations’ provision of specialist support was valued, but there was evidence of unmet need, with some participants reporting a lack of access to specialist grief or mental health support.

Conclusion

Children and young people have faced additional strains and challenges associated with pandemic bereavement. We recommend resources and initiatives that facilitate supportive communication within family and school settings, adequate resourcing of school and community-based specialist bereavement/mental health services, and increased information and signposting to the support that is available.

Peer Review reports

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in widespread global mass bereavement. Although children and young people are far less likely to suffer serious illness or death as a result of COVID-19, many have been bereaved of a close family member as a direct consequence of the virus, including 16,800 children bereaved of primary or secondary resident caregivers in the UK (e.g. parents or grandparents who live with them) [1]. Children and young people bereaved due to other causes of death have also experienced unprecedented levels of social disruption whilst dealing with their grief and bereavement.

Research has shown that childhood bereavement increases the risk of adverse outcomes across the life-course [2,3,4,5]. In pre-pandemic times it is estimated that 5 to 20% of bereaved children and adolescents develop psychiatric difficulties [6, 7], with predictions that this may increase during the pandemic [8, 9], along with psycho-social, educational and workplace problems [9]. Having the right informal and formal support in place for bereaved children and young people is essential for promoting resilience and mitigating the risks of future mental health and other problems [10]. As in public health models for adult bereavement care [11], a tiered approach has been conceptualised for children and young people. According to this model, all children, young people and their parents or carers should receive information on how children grieve, what can help, and when and where to seek help, combined with a supportive response from existing social networks (e.g. family, friends, teachers). Some will also need more formal support from services specialising in child bereavement, whilst the small proportion of those deemed vulnerable or traumatised will require individual or family intervention from specialist mental health services [12]. Schools and other community services have a role to play in providing information on grief symptoms and informally supporting children and families known to be bereaved, as well as assessing and addressing student needs for more formal emotional support [8, 13,14,15]. Schools in the UK commonly offer specialist emotional support including Emotional Literacy Support Assistants (ELSA), counselling and access to mental-health support. However, during periods of national lockdown and school closure in the UK (mid-March to July 2020 and January 2021 until March 2021) access to school and community services was significantly reduced, with available support predominantly provided online or by phone [16, 17].

Empirical evidence on the experiences of children and young people bereaved during the pandemic is lacking. More extensive evidence is emerging on adult grief and bereavement experiences, including from this research [18,19,20,21,22], although findings have varied between studies. Whilst some have reported higher levels of grief amongst those bereaved by COVID-19 compared with other types of deaths [23, 24], others have not found these differences to be statistically significant [22, 25]. Several studies indicate higher levels of grief and need for specialist support amongst all those bereaved during the pandemic, compared with pre-pandemic populations [18,19,20,21,22, 25,26,27]. These studies have identified the grief impacts of restricted visiting at the end of life, disrupted funerals and meaning-making and experiences of acute loneliness and isolation; factors which have affected most people bereaved at this time (not just those bereaved by COVID-19). Another study, by contrast, found no differences in levels of prolonged grief disorder, attendance at, or evaluations of funerals and other mourning rituals, between pandemic and pre-pandemic bereaved people [28].

A number of pandemic-related risk factors for bereaved children and young people have been proposed, similar to those investigated in adult studies. These have included bereavement after a sudden death, being unable to visit dying family members, missing the funeral, fear of further deaths within the family and the effects of frequent exposure to media reporting and other social abnormalities such as mask-wearing [8, 29, 30]. Disruption to daily routines, relationships and support networks caused by the pandemic, especially during periods of prolonged school closure and lockdowns, have been suggested to undermine the usual coping resources and mechanisms available to children and adolescents, including possibilities for respite from their grief [8, 30]. It has also been suggested that children may be at enhanced risk for negative mental health impacts caused by the pandemic generally, given their limited capacity to fully understand their surroundings and control their environments [8], and the known effects of loneliness and social isolation on depression and anxiety amongst children and adolescents [31].

Strain on family life due to work or financial pressures, combined with the parent’s own grief, may mean that is harder for them to provide their children with the emotional support that they need, whilst perceived parental distress may also stop children from talking about their feelings [8, 30, 32]. Pre-pandemic and pandemic research has demonstrated tendencies amongst adults to try to protect children by not talking about the death pre- and post-bereavement [8, 33,34,35,36], uncertainty about how best to prepare children for the death [34, 37], and difficulties maintaining parenting roles in the midst of their own grief and disruption [4]; factors which can impact negatively on children’s grieving and wellbeing. The difficulties of bereaved children and young people in managing and expressing their feelings has also been documented [4]. Conversely, clear and honest communication with children about the death has been demonstrated to improve psychosocial, mental and physical health outcomes [38, 39].

Despite these described concerns over the potentially enhanced vulnerability of children and young people bereaved at this time (and evidence suggestive of greater vulnerability in most of the adult studies discussed) there remains a lack of research specifically relating to the grief experiences, support networks and access to specialist support services amongst pandemic-bereaved children and young people. Based on free-text data from a national survey of adults bereaved in the UK during COVID-19, this paper reports parent/guardian perspectives on their children’s (aged 25 or under) informal and formal bereavement support needs and experiences, following the death of their family members. Policy and practice implications are identified for improving the support for children, young people and their families during and beyond the COVID-19 crisis.

Methods

Study design and aim

Free-text results are reported from the second round of a longitudinal survey which aims to investigate the grief experiences, support needs and use of bereavement support by people bereaved during the pandemic. The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys [40] was followed.

Survey development

An open web survey was designed by the research team, which includes a public representative (KS), with input from the study advisory group. It was piloted, refined with public representatives with experience of bereavement and tested by the study advisory group and colleagues. Open and closed questions covered grief experiences, and perceived needs for, access to and experiences of formal and informal bereavement support [18]. In response to stakeholder requests, the second round survey included a question which asked about children or young people living with the respondent, including their ages, and the free text question ‘Please tell us about any support that you feel they need and/or any support they have been receiving’ (supplementary file one). These data have been analysed for this paper.

Study procedure

The baseline survey was administered via JISC (https://www.onlinesurveys.ac.uk/) and was open from 28th August 2020 to 5th January 2021 [18]. It was disseminated to a convenience sample from social and mainstream media and via voluntary sector associations and bereavement support organisations, including those working with ethnic minority communities. Organisations helped disseminate the voluntary (non-incentivised) survey by sharing on social media, web-pages, newsletters, on-line forums and via direct invitations to potential participants. For ease of access, the survey was posted onto a bespoke study-specific website with a memorable URL (www.covidbereavement.com) [18]. The second follow up survey reported here was sent to baseline participants who consented to receive follow up surveys around seven months post date of death. These were personalised for each participant using individual survey links, labelled with their participant study IDs. Where baseline surveys were completed at least five months post-death (or the date of death was not given), the second survey was sent out two months after the first survey was received. All second round surveys were completed between 20/11/20 and 24/08/2021 and on average 242 days (median = 234 days or 8 months) after the date of death (range 145 to 345 days).

Inclusion criteria for study enrolment: aged 18+; family member or close friend bereaved since social-distancing requirements were introduced in the UK (16/03/2020); death occurred in the UK; ability to consent. The initial section of the survey requested informed consent and details data protection.

An additional inclusion criterion for this analysis was that participants reported on the experiences and/or needs of at least one child or young person aged 25 or under who lived with them.

Data analysis

Free-text survey responses were analysed using inductive thematic analysis, involving line-by-line coding in Excel and identification of descriptive and analytical themes [41]. The framework was revised and applied in an iterative process moving between the data and the analytical concepts to develop codes and themes grounded in the data. This involved double coding of the data set (EH, SG) and discussion and review of final themes by the research team. 27% (n = 104) of second round participants (n = 384) reported to have children or young people living with them aged 25 or under. 90% (n = 94) of these participants provided comments that related to their child/children’s bereavement experiences and support needs.

Results

Participants

Responses were included from 104 participants. Two participants were grandparents and the remainder were parents (n = 102). Most deaths were caused by COVID-19 (n = 55), followed by cancer (n = 21). The total number of children or young people reported was 176, with a median age of 13 (range 2–25 years). The children and young people in these families were most commonly bereaved of grandparents (n = 81), followed by parents (n = 14), siblings (n = 2) and aunts/uncles (n = 2) (Table 1).

Table 1 Participant characteristics (n = 104)

Themes

Three main themes and eleven sub-themes (Table 2) were identified: Challenges and struggles; family support and coping; and support from schools and services. Where observed, group differences such as those relating to the age of the child, or their relationship to the person who died, are noted in the descriptive narrative.

Table 2 Themes

Challenges and struggles

Although many respondents felt that their children were coping well, others described their children’s struggles to come to terms with the death of a parent, grandparent and other family member, with a small minority reporting signs of associated mental health problems such as night terrors, anxiety and depression. Some also described the compounding effects of the COVID-19 bereavement experience on pre-existing mental health issues (for the child and other family members), chronic conditions and educational needs, as well as other recent close bereavements.

‘My [child] is struggling with her grief, which has escalated over the last month or so. My [child] also has additional support needs which makes processing the situation even more difficult for her. My [parent] was shielding for several months and then to my [child] and [other relative] … just disappeared which has been extremely difficult for everyone.’ (RID025, parent of child/children aged under 12)

As seen in the above extracts, pandemic-related issues reported to exacerbate their child’s grief included being separated from their grandparent before their death due to the requirement for clinically vulnerable groups to self-isolate (known in the UK as ‘shielding’) and being unable to visit them prior to their death due to visiting restrictions. This separation and sense of ‘disappearance’ was felt to have made it harder for them to understand and process the situation, especially when they were then also isolated from their wider family and their other grandparent due to lockdown conditions.

‘It would have helped them if we could have spent more time with the wider family. They miss their [grandparent] and they haven’t been able to see their [other grandparent who] is in a support bubble with my [sibling].’ (RID692, parent of child/children aged under 12 and teenage)

Respondents described the added strain caused to their children by periods of national lockdown - including school and university closures - and the resulting disruption to their child’s daily routines and relationships. Older children and young people were particularly affected by isolation from their peers, experiencing difficulties expressing their feelings and interacting with friends remotely and, in the case of one University student, having ‘too much time on his hands’.

‘My [child] has really needed the support of her friends which is not allowed under current Covid restrictions. She has started 6th form but is unable to mingle socially so has kept her feelings to herself. She had a few private therapy sessions over the summer.’ (RID030, parent of teenage child/children)

In the case of a younger child whose grandparent died of COVID-19, the parent described her child’s anxiety over further deaths and perceived responsibility of avoiding contact with the virus, manifesting in obsessive behaviours.

‘My [children] live at home my youngest was very close to my [parent] and was very upset when [their grandparent] died. He was very nervous going back to school and then when he was told he had to isolate because they had a case in their year he wouldn’t come near me and kept washing his hands in a very ‘OCD” way. I asked why and he said ‘I don’t want to give it to you […] and for you to die like [grandparent]’ but he has been better since I do reassure him the best I can all the time.’ (RID595, parent of children ranging from under 12 to early 20s)

Family support and coping

Many participants described how they were supporting their children to manage and cope with their bereavement. They described how they tried to talk openly with their children about their grief, feelings and memories of their relative, taking time to actively remember them, and in one case creating a memory garden which they could ‘nourish’ together. One parent explained how they positively reflected with their children on how their grandparent escaped the further trauma of living through the pandemic. Some also reported using web-resources and books and stories relating to bereavement with their children. One grandparent noted the benefits of having a supportive network of family involved in supporting their grandchild following a parental death.

‘[We] have spent a lot of time with my [child] talking about my [parent] who [child] was very close to. We have looked at lots of photos [of them] and watched some film clips too. Our [child] has also now reached out to his other grandparent to establish a stronger relationship [with them]. [This grandparent] lives abroad but they zoom each week. I did look at the website of the charity [charity website] to give me ideas of how to support my [child].’ (RID511, parent of teenage child/children)

Several parents described how their children had chosen not to take up external support, preferring instead to talk with themselves and other friends and family. This was felt to be adequate in most cases, but some described their children struggling to open up to them, as well as their own challenges providing this support when coping with their own grief, perceiving a need for help to enable them to better support their child. Several parents described how their children worried when they (the parents) became upset, describing how they tried to stay strong to help protect their children.

‘I think my [child] need support but he doesn’t want to speak to a counsellor. He sometimes speaks to me and gets anxious and stressed but I don’t always feel I have the emotional resilience to cope and this makes me feel terrible.’ (RID518, Parent of teenage child/children)

Support from schools and services

Just under a quarter (n = 19) of respondents who had school-aged children described support received through schools following their bereavements. In roughly half of these cases additional, specialist emotional support had been received, including counselling, drama therapy and support from school-based pastoral teams and emotional literacy support assistants (ELSA). These interventions were valued not just for the help already given to their children, but also knowing that it was there if needed again in the future. However, it was noted how some of these services stopped during periods of school closure, with other programmes not available at all during the pandemic.

‘My [child] received some counselling at school. His teachers have also been very supportive. He only had a few counselling sessions as he felt that he didn’t need or want more. He knows that the service is there though’ (RID394, parent of teenage child/children)

Others described more general, but highly valued support provided by schools and teachers; only one parent described a lack of support and understanding. Features of valued support included checking in on students during closure periods, being aware of the student’s bereavement circumstances and potential problems, and proactively offering or placing students on the ‘radar’ for specialist emotional support if needed. Some also described the skills of teachers, trained in bereavement support, who discussed the bereavement with their children and themselves, supporting not only the children in their grief, but also the parent in tending to their child’s needs.

‘Both my [children] have been very well supported by their school. Their teachers have not shied away from having difficult conversations with them, and have supported them in their grief.’ (RID574, parent of child/children aged under 12)

Just under a quarter of respondents (n = 24) described needing or receiving additional support from bereavement or mental health services, for at least one of their children. Nine reported needing (but not receiving) additional support from bereavement or mental health services, almost all relating to grandparents who died of COVID-19. Reasons for needing and receiving specialist support included existing mental health conditions exacerbated by bereavement (amongst older children), as well as bereavement-associated trauma and distress relating to sudden, mostly COVID-19 deaths and a lack of understanding about what happened. Parents also described their children’s needs to talk to someone outside of the family about their feelings, their struggles coming to terms with the loss of a particularly close grandparent, other recent bereavements and first experiences of death, and the added complexities caused by not having been able to say goodbye and the effects of social isolation.

‘Need for support to talk to someone other than family about how they are feeling. Was tough as at the time of the bereavement as they had no face-to-face contact with friends and less able to talk about their feelings.’ (RID040, parent of teenage child/children)

The counselling and psychological support received was mostly found to be helpful, with the positive relationships and skills of therapists/counsellors noted. However, a couple of parents felt that their children needed more sessions than the allocated amount, noting how they could not afford to pay for private sessions, as well as their child’s concerns about having to connect and repeat the process with a different counsellor.

‘They have received counselling from [children’s bereavement charity]. The counsellor is fantastic but they are only able to offer 6–8 weeks of 1hr sessions. This is not enough for them. My [child] is very upset that the counselling had to stop and that she will now need to go through it all again if we start a different counsellor. I can’t really afford to pay for [several] people to have counselling at once.’ (RID055 parent of teenage child/children)

One parent described difficulties with the family-based support provided, as her children were at different developmental stages, instead perceiving a need for separate child-focused services for her youngest child.

‘They definitely need support as they are at very different stages. We had a family bereavement session but the younger [child] hated it [and] needs children’s services. Need to look at local groups. My older [child] was offered counselling via uni but at the time she was OK. I think now she needs to start this - I have mentioned it to her. We were initially waiting to see if they could have face to face support but obviously that isn’t possible so I think online will work for now.’ (RID084 parent of teenage child/children)

Reasons why some children and young people were not getting the support needed included absence of or delayed referrals to child bereavement or mental health services caused by the pandemic, long waiting times for support, not knowing how to get support, preferences for face-to-face support, and resistance from their children to receiving external support.

‘[Child] has been supported by me but unable to see family as they do not live locally [and is] unable to see friends face to face - so been worse for her. I provide her bereavement support as has not wanted to use services as she is very sceptical that they will offer her anything’. (RID341 parent of teenage child/children)

Discussion

This study describes the support needs and experiences of children and young people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic, as perceived by their parents or guardians. Key findings include pandemic-related challenges relating to separation from the person who died prior to their death, isolation from peers and other family members and disruption to daily routines, and wider support networks during periods of school/university closure. Examples were given of effective family coping and communication, but also struggles relating to parental grief and pre-existing child mental health problems. The role of schools and bereavement charities in providing specialist support was demonstrated and valued, but there was evidence of unmet needs and lack of access to specialist grief or mental health support.

In terms of the bereavement challenges and difficulties experienced by children and young people, these findings point to the compounding effects of pre-existing mental health conditions and other recent close bereavements, as well as previously observed communication and emotional difficulties experienced by parents grappling with their own grief whilst supporting their children [8, 33, 34, 36]. They also provide empirical evidence for many of the pandemic-specific stressors hypothesised for children and young people [8, 9], and observed for bereaved adults [18,19,20,21,22, 26]. These include loss-related challenges such as separation from grandparents due to ‘shielding’, being unable to visit or say good-bye to them immediately prior to the death, and being apart from other family members in early bereavement [18,19,20,21,22, 26]; all factors which were felt to make the death harder to process and accept. The coping abilities of children and young people were also challenged by lack of social support caused by isolation from peers and other family members during lockdown, loss of routine and opportunity for potential respite and distraction at school/ university during periods of closure, as well as anxiety relating to contracting and spreading the virus to other family members when schools reopened.

Different sources of informal and formal emotional support were described. A number of family coping and communication strategies were identified, some of which are known from previous research to support healthy adaptation and grieving [8, 38, 39]. These included open communication with children about the death and their feelings about it, actively remembering the person who died, using on-line resources, and reading books relating to grief and bereavement with their children. The important role of schools in providing informal and formal emotional support was also demonstrated, in line with previous research and established models of good practice [8, 12,13,14,15]. Checking in during lockdowns, being aware of the student’s bereavement circumstances, and proactively monitoring and offering students specialist emotional support if felt to be needed were valued approaches, as were the conversational skills and bereavement competencies of teachers. However, school closures during lockdowns meant that some children in need of additional support from teachers and bereavement specialists were unable to access it when they needed it.

Although a good proportion of respondents felt that their children were coping well, findings also suggest reasonably high levels of need for specialist bereavement or mental health support amongst some of the children of our parent/guardian sample. Around a quarter of respondents described receiving or needing additional specialist support from either schools, bereavement charities or mental health services for at least one of their children. This need for help followed the death of grandparents as well as parents, with unmet need most evident in relation to the death of grandparents due to COVID-19. Where children and young people were not getting the additional support that their parents perceived them to need, this was for reasons such as pandemic-related delays to referrals, waiting lists, lack of appropriate support, concerns over the costs of obtaining private counselling support, not knowing how to get support, and resistance or disinterest from the child or young person. Recent findings from the UK that only a tenth of relatives bereaved during the pandemic were asked about their deceased relative’s relationships with children [34], and only a third were provided with information about bereavement support by a healthcare or other care professional [28], suggest that important opportunities for providing families with information about child grief and support services may be being missed [19].

Strengths, weaknesses and implications for research

This free-text data collected from parent/guardian participants in a large national study of people’s experiences of bereavement during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK provides important insights into the difficulties, support needs and experiences of bereaved children and young people, from the perspective of their parents/guardians. Limitations include the fact that we did not hear from children and young people directly, and that this data was collected from a single question which formed part of a broader questionnaire and study focused on adult experiences and needs. We are therefore reliant on parental assessments which are likely shaped by their own grief experiences and perspectives, and may not fully understand or recognize the needs and feelings of their children. Lack of random sampling also means that the survey is not statistically representative of the whole bereaved population. Despite significant efforts and targeted recruitment, people from minority ethnic backgrounds and men are underrepresented in the data set overall and in responses to this question, with most perspectives representing those of white heterosexual women. With additional questions we may also have been able to observe more specific differences relating to the age of children and young people, and their grief experiences and support needs. Most bereavements were of grandparents, with small group sizes for other types of bereavements including those likely to have greater impact, such as death of a parent or sibling, hence needs for specialist support may be greater than is reported here.

Future research is needed which focuses specifically on the experiences of children and young people, in particular from those population groups worst affected by COVID-19 in the UK and whose voices are seldom heard in research, policy and practice. These include Black and minority ethnic families, families living in areas of high socio-economic deprivation, families with LGBTQ + parents and people with learning disabilities. Hearing directly from children and young people themselves, using mixed-methods approaches is of upmost importance for furthering our understandings of children’s grief and support needs. Research exploring school and specialist provider perspectives and experiences of supporting bereaved families during the pandemic, and in particular the use and acceptability of remote/on-line interventions, is also recommended.

Conclusions and implications for policy and practice

These results demonstrate the added challenges faced by children and young people who experienced the death of a family member during the COVID-19 pandemic. These included loss-related issues caused by being unable to spend time with their relatives before they died as well as the disruption to usual coping mechanisms and resources caused by social isolation and school and university closures. Despite these difficulties, many parents felt that their children were resilient and coping well with their support, with the informal support of teachers, schools and wider family also valued. However, a significant minority described the additional, more specialist emotional or mental health support needed or received by their children. Barriers such as waiting lists, lack of appropriate support and information on how to get specialist support prevented some families from accessing the support that their children needed. Based on these study findings, we make three main recommendations for improving the support available for bereaved children and young people generally and with specific regard to pandemic contexts:

  1. 1)

    Facilitating open communication and healthy grieving within families and among friends, via the promotion of age-appropriate, accessible self-help resources and materials made available online and via community organisations such as schools, libraries, GP practices and pharmacies. Provision of informal sessions aimed at improving community grief literacy with respect to children as well as adults, with specific consideration to the pandemic context in shaping grief experiences, is also recommended [9, 30, 42, 43].

  2. 2)

    Training for school staff to have age-appropriate conversations with students around grief and bereavement, and to be able to identify when a child might need additional specialist support (which should also be available within the school setting). During periods of lockdown and school closure, regular check-ins with bereaved families are important. Specialist programmes should continue for existing students (remotely if needed), whilst also proactively identifying and engaging with newly bereaved families who may need support. Finding ways of facilitating peer support for older children may also help counter the effects of social isolation during lockdown periods.

  3. 3)

    Adequate resourcing of specialist childhood bereavement and mental health services to tackle gaps in some regions, reduce long waiting lists and enable longer term support, with children bereaved of a grandparent or other family member also considered eligible for intervention when needed. Information should be provided on available bereavement and mental health services by healthcare professionals following the death and made publicly available online, including NHS webpages, as well community settings such as libraries, schools and General Practice surgeries so that parents can more easily identify appropriate locally available support. Greater system-level investment and disaster-planning in child and adolescent mental health infrastructure is also needed to ensure the future resilience and adaptability of these urgent care services during pandemics.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the need to ensure participant anonymity but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Imperial College, London. COVID-19 Response Team. COVID-19 Orphanhood. https://imperialcollegelondon.github.io/orphanhood_calculator/#/country/United%20Kingdom Accessed 24/08/22.

  2. Kissil K. Parental death and grief interventions. In: Davey M, Kissil K, Lynch L, editors. Helping children and families cope with parental illness: a clinician’s guide. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016. pp. 223–48.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li J, Vestergaard M, Cnattingius S, Gissler M, Bech BH, Obel C, Olsen J. Mortality after parental death in childhood: a nationwide cohort study from three Nordic countries. PLoS Med. 2014 Jul;22(7):e1001679. 11(.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rolls L, Payne SA. Children and young people’s experience of UK childhood bereavement services. Mortality. 2007 Aug 1;12(3):281–303.

  5. Kaplow JB, Saunders J, Angold A, Costello EJ. Psychiatric symptoms in bereaved versus nonbereaved youth and young adults: a longitudinal epidemiological study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2010 Nov 1;49(11):1145-54.

  6. Spuij M, Prinzie P, Dekovic M, van den Bout J, Boelen PA. The effectiveness of Grief-Help, a cognitive behavioural treatment for prolonged grief in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:395. doi:https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/1745-6215-14-395.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dowdney L. Childhood Bereavement Following Parental Death. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. 2000 41(7),819–830. doi:https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/1469-7610.00670.

  8. Albuquerque S, Santos AR. “In the Same Storm, but Not on the Same Boat”: Children Grief During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 26;12:23.

  9. Weinstock L, Dunda D, Harrington H, Nelson H. It’s complicated—adolescent grief in the time of COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 23;12:166.

  10. Stokes J. Resilience and bereaved children: Helping a child to develop a resilient mind-set following the death of a parent. Bereave Care. 2009 Apr;28(1)(1):9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aoun SM, Breen LJ, O’Connor M, Rumbold B, Nordstrom C. A public health approach to bereavement support services in palliative care. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012;36:14–6. pmid:22313700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Childhood Bereavement Network. Grief Matters for Children. 2017. https://nationalbereavementalliance.org.uk/grief-matters-for-children/.

  13. Irish Childhood Bereavement Network. Childhood Bereavement Care Pyramid. 2014. https://www.childhoodbereavement.ie/professionals/childhood-bereavement-care-pyramid/.

  14. Dyregrov K, Kristensen P, Johnsen I, et al. The psychosocial follow-up after the terror of July 22nd 2011 as experienced by the bereaved. Scand Psychol 2015; 2, https://psykologisk.no/sp/2015/02/e1/.

  15. Dyregrov A, Dyregrov K, Lytje M. Loss in the family – A reflection on how schools can support their students, Bereavement Care 2020 39:3, 95–101, DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/02682621.2020.1828722.

  16. Pearce C, Honey JR, Lovick R, et al. ‘A silent epidemic of grief’: a survey of bereavement care provision in the UK and Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Open. 2021;11(3):e046872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. National Bereavement Alliance. Covid 19: the response of voluntary sector bereavement services, https://nationalbereavementalliance.org.uk/ourpublications/covid-19-the-response-of-voluntary-sector-bereavement-services last accessed 24/08/22.

  18. Harrop EJ, Goss S, Farnell DJ, Longo M, Byrne A, Barawi K, Torrens-Burton A, Nelson A, Seddon K, Machin L, Sutton E. Support needs and barriers to accessing support: Baseline results of a mixed-methods national survey of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic. Palliat Med. 2021. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/02692163211043372.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Selman LE, Farnell DJ, Longo M, Goss S, Seddon K, Torrens-Burton A, Mayland CR, Wakefield D, Johnston B, Byrne A, Harrop E. Risk factors associated with poorer experiences of end-of-life care and challenges in early bereavement: Results of a national online survey of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic. Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;36(4):717–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Torrens-Burton A, Goss S, Sutton E, Barawi K, Longo M, Seddon K, Carduff E, Farnell DJ, Nelson A, Byrne A, Phillips R. ‘It was brutal. It still is’: a qualitative analysis of the challenges of bereavement during the COVID-19 pandemic reported in two national surveys. Palliative care and social practice. 2022 Apr;16:26323524221092456.

  21. Harrop E, Selman LE. Bereavement during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK: What do we know so far?. Bereavement Journal of Grief and Responses to Death. 2022 Jan 13;1.

  22. Selman LE, Farnell DJ, Longo M, Goss S, Torrens-Burton A, Seddon K, Mayland C, Machin L, Byrne A, Harrop EJ. Factors associated with higher levels of grief and support needs among people bereaved during the pandemic: Results from a national online survey. medRxiv. 2022 Jan 1.

  23. Breen LJ, Lee SA, Neimeyer RA. Psychological Risk Factors of Functional Impairment After COVID-19 Deaths. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 61: e1-e4. 2021/01/22. DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.01.006.

  24. Eisma MC, Tamminga A, Smid GE, Boelen PA. Acute grief after deaths due to COVID-19, natural causes and unnatural causes: An empirical comparison. Journal of affective disorders. 2021 Jan 1;278:54 – 6.

  25. Breen LJ, Mancini VO, Lee SA, et al. Risk factors for dysfunctional grief and functional impairment for all causes of death during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of meaning. Death Stud 2021: 1-https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2021/09/14. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2021.1974666.

  26. Neimeyer RA, Lee SA. Circumstances of the death and associated risk factors for severity and impairment of COVID-19 grief. Death Stud 2021: 1–9. 2021/05/22. DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/07481187.2021.1896459.

  27. Eisma MC, Tamminga A Grief Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multiple Group Comparisons. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 60: e1-e4. 2020/10/17. DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.004.

  28. Mitima-Verloop HB, Mooren TTM, Kritikou ME, et al. Restricted Mourning: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Funeral Services, Grief Rituals, and Prolonged Grief Symptoms. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:878818. 2022/06/18. DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.878818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stroebe M, Schut H. Bereavement in times of COVID-19: a review and theoretical framework. OMEGA J Death Dying. 2020;82:500–22. doi:https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/0030222820966928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Penny A. Coronavirus. Support for bereaved children and young people. National Children’s Bureau/Childhood Bereavement Network. https://www.ncb.org.uk/about-us/media-centre/news-opinion/coronavirus-support-bereaved-children-and-young-people. Last accessed 09/11/21.

  31. Loades ME, Chatburn E, Higson-Sweeney N, Reynolds S, Shafran R, Brigden A, et al. Rapid systematic review: the impact of social isolation and loneliness on the mental health of children and adolescents in the context of COVID-19. J Am Acad Child Adolescent Psychiatry. 2020;59:1218–39.e3. doi:https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.05.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dyregrov K, Dyregrov A. Siblings after suicide - “the forgotten bereaved”. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2005;35:714–24. doi:https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1521/suli.2005.35.6.714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Trozzi M, Missimini K. Talking with Children about Loss: Words, Strategies, and Wisdom to Help Children Cope with Death, Divorce and Other Difficult Times. London: Penguin Group; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rapa E, Hanna JR, Mayland CR, Mason S, Moltrecht B, Dalton LJ. Experiences of preparing children for a death of an important adult during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods study. BMJ open. 2021 Aug 1;11(8):e053099.

  35. Semple CJ, McCaughan E, Beck ER, et al. ‘Living in parallel worlds’ - bereaved parents’ experience of family life when a parent with dependent children is at end of life from cancer: A qualitative study. Palliat Med. 2021;35:933–42. 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Marshall S, Fearnley R, Bristowe K, et al. The perspectives of children and young people affected by parental life-limiting illness: an integrative review and thematic synthesis. Palliat Med. 2021;35:246–60. 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hanna JR, McCaughan E, Semple CJ. Challenges and support needs of parents and children when a parent is at end of life: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2019;33:1017–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dalton L, Rapa E, Ziebland S, et al. Communication with children and adolescents about the diagnosis of a life-threatening condition in their parent. The Lancet. 2019;393:1164–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ellis J, Dowrick C, Lloyd-Williams M. The long-term impact of early parental death: lessons from a narrative study. J R Soc Med. 2013;106:57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. ISSN1478-0887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. www.compassionate-communitiesuk.co.uk/ Last accessed 26th October 2021.

  43. Breen LJ, Kawashima D, Joy K, Cadell S, Roth D, Chow A, Macdonald ME. Grief literacy: A call to action for compassionate communities. Death studies. 2020 Mar 18:1–9.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our thanks to everyone who completed the survey for sharing their experiences, and to all the individuals and organisations that helped disseminate the survey. We would also like to thank the collaborators and study advisory group members; Stephanie Sivell, Catriona Mayland, Linda Machin, Anne Finucane, Emma Carduff, Audrey Roulston, Bridget Johnston, Kirsten Smith.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by the UKRI/ESRC (Grant No. ES/V012053/1). The project was also supported by the Marie Curie core grant funding to the Marie Curie Research Centre, Cardiff University (grant no. MCCC-FCO-11-C). E.H., A.N., A.B. and M.L. posts are supported by the Marie Curie core grant funding (grant no. MCCC-FCO-11-C). ATB is funded by Welsh Government through Health and Care Research Wales. The funder was not involved in the study design, implementation, analysis or interpretation of the results, and has not contributed to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.H. and L.E.S. designed the study, led the application for funding and are co-principal investigators; E.H. drafted the paper; M.L., S.G., A.B., D.F., A.N., A.T.B., A.P. are members of the research team or the study advisory group and contributed to the design of the study and survey. E.H. and S.G. conducted the thematic analysis of qualitative data. All authors contributed to drafting the paper and read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Harrop.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol and supporting documentation was approved by Cardiff University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (SMREC 20/59). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all respondents provided informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors except AP declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article. AP declared a potential financial interest relating to lobbying by the Childhood Bereavement Network and National Bereavement Alliance for additional financial support for the bereavement sector.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harrop, E., Goss, S., Longo, M. et al. Parental perspectives on the grief and support needs of children and young people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic: qualitative findings from a national survey. BMC Palliat Care 21, 177 (2022). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12904-022-01066-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12904-022-01066-4

Keywords